{"id":2136,"date":"2019-12-05T11:08:43","date_gmt":"2019-12-05T11:08:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/?p=2136"},"modified":"2026-01-02T11:07:53","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T11:07:53","slug":"uk-opinion-poll-tracker-december-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-opinion-poll-tracker-december-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Opinion Poll Tracker #16 – December 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

Next Thursday, the UK will vote in its 3rd general election in less than 5 years.\u00a0 After serious polling errors in the last 3 general elections, it is understandable that everyone is taking the latest figures with a lot of salt.\u00a0 As it stands today, the polls are telling us that the Conservatives have more or less recovered their 2017 standing but Labour are still behind their 2017 performance.<\/p>\n

<\/h4>\n

Data used in this post<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Since the summer of this year, I have been recording the vote shares for Great Britain from these 10 pollsters :- BMG, Comres, Deltapoll, ICM, Ipsos-Mori, Kantar-TNS, Opinium, Panelbase, Survation & YouGov<\/strong>.\u00a0 I have also been recording the following crossbreaks where the pollster had a sample of at least 100.\u00a0 These are indicated by the brown I in the table here.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Prior to the election, I recorded the last available poll from each pollster in each month.\u00a0 Since the election was called, I have recorded the latest poll within each week with a week defined to be Thursday to Wednesday.\u00a0 Which week a poll falls in is based on the last day of fieldwork.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Summary<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

\"\"\u00a0 \"\"<\/p>\n

I will explore each level of these tables in separate sections further down but here is my reading of the big picture presented by these polls.<\/p>\n

The question everyone is asking themselves is whether the outcome of the 2019 election will be different from 2017.\u00a0 Will we have another hung parliament or will the Conservatives get an overall majority?\u00a0 No other outcome is being seriously suggested so in this post, I am going to focus on what needs to change from 2017 for there to be a different result in 2019 in the form of a Conservative majority.<\/p>\n

The top line picture is that at the national and regional levels, the Conservatives are essentially matching their 2017 vote share.\u00a0 If this is where they remain come election day, then they will only get a majority if either they can redistribute their votes efficiently e.g. from safe seats to marginals, or if the Labour vote is down on 2017.\u00a0 For the first scenario, we will need to see if the Conservatives are maintaining their 2017 vote share in all categories or if they are gaining in some categories and losing in other categories.\u00a0 The data suggests the latter is the case but at present it is not clear if the redistribution is efficient.<\/p>\n

It may be the case that the Conservatives don’t need to worry about the efficiency of voter redistribution since Labour is currently 8 to 11 points down on 2017.\u00a0 However, we all remember how Labour closed a similar gap in the last 2 weeks in 2017 and the polls will be keenly watched between now and 12th December for signs of this happening again.\u00a0 The question to be answered is from where will Labour recover those lost votes?\u00a0 The data makes clear that for most part, it is about those who say they will vote Lib Dem, especially Middle Class Remainers, which opens up the whole issue of tactical voting and how large a part this will play.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Great Britain<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

I’ve decided to plot all the latest trends for all categories against known data for previous elections back to 1974.\u00a0 There is no question that Boris Johnson has managed an impressive recovery in the polls since taking over from Theresa May and the chart makes it clear that the majority of the recovery has been due to Brexit party voters switching to the Conservatives.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Conservatives have been flat for the last 3 weeks and I don’t this will change much between now and the election.<\/p>\n

Labour’s recovery since then has been much more modest but has picked up over the last 2 weeks.\u00a0 But on current trends, they need a repeat of the 2017 polling error to close the gap.\u00a0 Their position is due mostly to the stubbornness of the Lib Dem vote which after two miserable elections, is back at the low end of the range the Lib Dems occupied between 1974 & 2010.<\/p>\n

Both the Greens and the Brexit Party (as a replacement for UKIP) are up on 2017 but I think their actual vote shares on election day will be the same as 2017 as their voters make tactical voting decisions.\u00a0 The question will be which parties will benefit from those decisions.<\/p>\n

The table shown here supplements the chart above and shows more precise timings in the changes in the fortunes of each party.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By Electoral Region – England (excl London)<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

In 2017, I was badly bitten by polling errors<\/a> in my attempt to track voting intentions by each of the 8 English electoral regions.\u00a0 For the 2019 EU Parliament elections, I decided it was better to track vote intentions for England as a whole excluding London and then use historical regional variations between the parties to allocate votes to each region<\/a>.\u00a0 I felt that worked quite well hence my decision to do the same for the general election.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

At the moment, my comments on the GB trends pretty much apply to EnglandXL (as I label it) in their entirety.<\/p>\n

I should note that I record the vote shares for EnglandXL by breaking out the relevant crossbreaks from each pollster’s poll.\u00a0 EnglandXL accounts for 460 of the 650 seats in parliament so sample size is not an issue for this crossbreak.\u00a0 6 pollsters give crossbreaks for London so allowing London to be split off from England.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By Electoral Region – London<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

For other electoral regions, I am only recording pollster crossbreaks whose weighted sample size exceeds 100 which is the case for 6 pollsters.\u00a0 However, YouGov also carry out an exclusive poll in conjunction with Queen Mary University of London with a much larger sample.\u00a0 When this occurs, I give this poll 5 times the weight of any crossbreak.\u00a0 For the latest week, So far, the QMUL poll has been run in weeks 1 & 5 of the election campaign so these figures are fairly reliable.\u00a0 Also, YouGov ran their MRP poll in week 4 with a considerable (but different) sample size so that week is fairly reliable as well.\u00a0 It is weeks 2 & that are solely crossbreaks and thus less reliable.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The key issue in London is that Labour is doing worse and the Lib Dems better than elsewhere.\u00a0 At the moment that must be beneficial to the Conservatives despite London being a Remain city.<\/p>\n

It should be noted that London has seen a number of constituency specific polls carried out by Deltapoll and Survation.\u00a0 I have recorded this data but have not analysed it yet.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By Electoral Region – Scotland<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

In terms of data, Scotland is similar to London in that most crossbreaks are large enough to be recorded and better quality data is also available from Scotland specific polls carried out by Panelbase.\u00a0 In fact week 4 also saw large samples for Scotland from Ipsos Mori and YouGov MRP as well.\u00a0 Other weeks of the campaign had to rely on crossbreaks.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The SNP is dominant in Scotland but at the moment, it doesn’t look like they have made any significant gains since 2017.\u00a0 They may still benefit from the fact that Labour is down whilst the Lib Dems are up.\u00a0 The one thing to note is that almost no-one is intending to vote Green or Brexit so from now on, vote switching will have to take place among the top 4 parties.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By Electoral Region – Wales<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Unlike Scotland & London, most Welsh crossbreaks are too small to be recorded.\u00a0 Therefore the chart below is mostly based on the Welsh Barometer poll carried out by YouGov.\u00a0 This took place this week and last occurred in the 1st week of the campaign.\u00a0 The intervening two weeks are some crossbreaks I’ve recorded simply to fill in the gaps but no weight should be placed on these.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The most notable factor about Wales is the large intended vote for the Brexit Party of 8%.\u00a0 With the Conservatives already around their 2017 vote share,\u00a0 persuading these voters to switch has to be their priority especially with Labour down on 2017.\u00a0 At the very least, the Conservatives need to prevent them from voting Labour and if that happens, they can gain seats.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By GE 2017 Vote – Conservatives<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

My charts for GE17 & EU16 all use Lord Ashcroft data to derive the data for GE17 & GE15, notably his large post-GE17 poll<\/a> which allowed GE17 voters to be split according to whether they also voted in 2015 & 2016.\u00a0 In this chart, by definition since we are looking at everyone who voted Conservative in 2017, the scale is 100% for GE17.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

This chart shows us that 70% of CON17 voters had previously voted Conservative in 2015 which means 30% came from elsewhere.\u00a0 Some will have been new voters in 2017 but most were former UKIP voters (16%) plus about 5% each from Labour & Lib Dems.<\/p>\n

When Johnson took over from May, only 60% were planning to vote Conservative but that figure is now back to 84%.\u00a0 The bulk of that has come from the Brexit Party where the 27% of CON17 who were planning to vote BRX is now down to 3%.\u00a0 Whilst Johnson will still hope to gather up the remaining 3%, he has succeeded in the first step of recovering most of these voters. At the same time, he has reduced the leakage to the Lib Dems, who are in 2nd place in quite a few seats in the South, from 10% to 9%.\u00a0 As yet there is no sign of significant defections to Labour.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By GE 2017 Vote – Labour<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Since the Conservatives are more or less back to 2017 levels but have only recovered 5 out of every 6 CON17 voters, this tells you that the Conservatives are draining voters from other parties.\u00a0 Most notable is the latest figure in this chart which shows that 9% of LAB17 voters plan to vote Conservative this time compared to only 2% when Theresa May stood down.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

These are either Labour Leavers that Theresa May failed to capture in 2017 or are UKIP15 to LAB17 switchers.\u00a0 I have written before that I am convinced that the level of UKIP to Labour switching in 2017 was larger than people think.\u00a0 If that is the case, then capturing them should be easier given how Labour’s Brexit policy has developed since then.<\/p>\n

The larger problem for Labour is that they’ve only managed to claw back 1\/3 of their 2017 defectors compared to the 2\/3 managed by the Conservatives.\u00a0 Prominent among those still to be clawed back are the 1 in 11 LAB17 voters who plan vote Lib Dem.\u00a0 Are these defectors completely lost to Labour or can then be encouraged to vote tactically for Labour?\u00a0 Since the election was called, Labour has managed to draw back in about half of these defectors as well as some Green & Brexit Party defectors but these have been partly offset by additional defectors to the Conservatives.<\/p>\n

Over the next two weeks, the challenge will be to claw back more of the Lib Dem defectors whilst not losing more defectors to the Conservatives or vice versa.\u00a0 I am not sure Labour can claw back both sets of defectors since in all probability, these defectors are on opposite sides of the fence when it comes to Brexit.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By GE 2017 Vote – Liberal Democrats<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Lib Dems are currently polling about double where they were in 2017.\u00a0 They are taking voters from both Labour and the Conservatives but they have also been losing a 1\/3 of their 2017 voters.\u00a0 That points to extreme volatility in their voters.\u00a0 It is striking that only 50% of their 2017 voters had previously voted for them in 2015 yet the Lib Dem vote share was virtually the same in both elections.\u00a0 So whilst losing 33% is a lot, it isn’t as large as 2017 which suggests a slightly stickier Lib Dem vote this time.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The voters they have lost are broadly splitting equally between the Conservatives and Labour.\u00a0 That means that the CON17 & LAB17 that the Lib Dems have been pulling in will be partly offset by the losses.<\/p>\n

All in all, the bottom line is that whatever movements take place in the Lib Dem vote, the effect on Labour and Conservatives are currently balancing themselves out.\u00a0 What will matter is whether that balance is repeated at the constituency level and if not, which party gets the benefit?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By EU 2016 Vote – Leavers<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

As I stated earlier, the data shown here for GE15 & GE17 comes from the Lord Ashcroft post GE17 poll.\u00a0 It’s important to note that Leavers here are not all those who voted Leave in 2016, it is those voted Leave in 2016 AND voted in GE17.\u00a0 Turnout in 2017 was 3.5 pts lower than 2016 which means we have Leave voters who did not vote in 2017.\u00a0 I am basically making the assumption that they will not vote in 2019 as well.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Two big changes are apparent.\u00a0 When Johnson became PM, 40% of these Leavers were intending to vote for the Brexit Party whilst for Conservatives and Labour, the figures were 33% & 12% respectively.\u00a0 Today, only 8% plan to vote BRX whilst 70% will vote Conservative and 15% Labour.\u00a0 Given that 25% of these Leavers had voted Labour in 2017, that in a nutshell explains why the Conservatives enjoy the lead they have at the moment over Labour.\u00a0 If Labour wants to close the gap like they did in 2017, they have to get those 10% of Leavers back.\u00a0 Recent reports in the news indicate that Labour is fully aware of that<\/a> and but the polls this week tell us if that has not been successful so far.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By EU 2016 Vote – Remainers<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

90% of Remainers who voted Labour in 2017 are intending to vote Labour again in 2019.\u00a0 The point is though they have yet to exceed their 2017 performance with Remainers whereas the Conservatives have already exceeded their 2017 performance with Leavers.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Conservatives are down among these Remainers by 7 points from GE17 but that of course has been cancelled out by the 9 pt gain since GE17 among Leavers.\u00a0 For me, this is the key statistic that confirms that the CON17 vote, whilst matching 2017 levels, is being redistributed from Remainers to Leavers.\u00a0 The efficiency of this redistribution will be key to determining their chances of an outright majority even if Labour do manage to claw back some of their Lib Dem defectors.\u00a0 I’ve yet to do the analysis but I want to see which of these two situations is closer to the truth.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Remainers are defecting from the Conservatives in Tory held marginals whilst Leavers are moving to the Conservatives in safe Labour seats.<\/li>\n
  2. Remainers are defecting from the Conservatives in safe True Blue seats whilst Leavers are moving to the Conservatives in Labour marginals.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The former will deny the Conservatives a majority if Labour do make gains over the next two weeks and could still make things tricky even without Labour gains.\u00a0 The latter gives the Conservatives their majority even if Labour stage a comeback of some sort.\u00a0 The seat by seat analysis here could be extremely interesting!<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    By EU 2016 Non Voters<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

    I realised this week that many pollsters are effectively implying that around 20% of voters in 2019 will not have voted in 2016.\u00a0 Of course, those who were between the ages of 15 & 17 in 2016 are now eligible to vote and they make up some of the non-voters.\u00a0 EU nationals taking British citizenship will be another and at the same time, some older voters will have passed away.\u00a0 But I am still surprised at the implied size of this non-voting group.\u00a0 I need to more research into this but the chart below has good figures for the last week since I am now recording these crossbreaks for as many pollsters as possible whereas for previous weeks and months, it was only 1 or 2 pollsters and indeed in September it was none.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    This is a group of voters that I knew I needed to account for in my seat modelling.\u00a0 Until now, I was planning to treat them as Remainers in terms of voting intention.\u00a0 What is interesting though is that whilst the Labour vote share is the same as for Remainers, the Conservatives are doing better and the Lib Dems worse than Remainers among 2016 non-voters.\u00a0 That might mean I need to change my assumption that they are in effect Remainers.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    By “Social Class” – ABC1<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

    The last two charts uses Ipsos-MORI data for historical estimates of how “social classes” voted in elections between 1974 & 2017.\u00a0 This is a long running series but it is important to understand that the definition of class is not self-identity, it is based upon a standard definition using occupation for the most part and has been widely used for decades.\u00a0 What you have to careful of though is calling ABC1 “Middle Class” and C2DE “Working Class”.\u00a0 A recent piece of work by YouGov shows that they correlate with personal class identify quite poorly<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    That does not stop them from being useful categories.\u00a0 When it comes to ABC1, this has always been a Conservative demographic until the Labour landslide of 1997 when the gap narrowed.\u00a0 Since then, the Conservatives have struggled to reclaim their dominance of ABC1s and Labour in fact had their best ever performance in 2017.<\/p>\n

    When it comes to clawing back voters since Johnson became PM, the Conservatives have had more success than Labour, bringing 3\/4 back into the fold compared to Labour’s 1\/2.\u00a0 The biggest threat to the Conservatives could well be in wealthy middle class seats of the South where the Lib Dems are often in 2nd place.\u00a0 The table shows the Conservative lead over Lib Dems has fallen by 10 points but it has to be said that these seats are often True Blue with healthy majorities so I do not see the Lib Dems inflicting much damage in these seats.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    By “Social Class” – C2DE<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

    In 2017, I predicted history would be made with the Conservatives winning the C2DE vote for the first time ever.\u00a0 In the event the 4pt underestimate of the Labour vote undid that but today the polls show a clear win for the Conservatives.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    This demographic is known to be a Leave voting segment but it is striking that over the campaign, Labour is up 1o points whilst the Brexit party is down 8 points.\u00a0 This takes us back to the 2017 dynamic that I am convinced is underestimated whereby UKIP15 voters became LAB17 voters.\u00a0 This is the battle I am watching very closely because this is where the Labour comeback could materialise especially in the Northern Labour seats that the Conservatives are targeting.\u00a0 These are seats with few Lib Dems & Greens in the first place to cast tactical votes so attracting the Brexit party supporters will be key.\u00a0 Whether they can do it is another matter.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    My Seat Forecast for GE2019<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

    This will be published in a separate post but I am still in the process of doing the modelling.\u00a0 I expect to publish a full forecast on my blog on Tuesday 10th December.<\/p>\n

    If you are interested in how I will make my forecasts, I expect to follow the methodology I explained in this tweet earlier this year<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    To finish off this post, I though I would show you this graphic of the 2019 battleground.\u00a0 I am not going to explain it, I am hoping it is self explanatory!<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    — Want to Comment on this Post? —<\/span><\/h4>\n

    If you would like to comment on this post and others listed further down, you can do so on these twitter threads.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. The thread linked to the charts in this post<\/a><\/li>\n
    2. A thread linked to my Opinion Poll Tracker for 27th November 2019<\/a><\/li>\n
    3. The same charts as this post but for week ending 20th November 2019<\/a><\/li>\n
    4. Some thoughts on the effects of UKIP stand downs in 2017<\/a><\/li>\n
    5. Some thoughts on what the Brexit Party needed to do to make a breakthrough<\/a><\/li>\n
    6. Some thoughts from Jan 2019 on what Labour have to do to get a majority<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      — More Posts about Opinion Polls —<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

      Since the 2017 General Election when my forecast was undermined by yet another polling failure, I have written a number of posts about the long term accuracy of opinion polls and these are listed below:-<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. How should pollster house effects be accounted for?<\/a> (see 2nd half of the post)<\/li>\n
      2. How accurate are the opinion polls in the UK?<\/a><\/li>\n
      3. Who is the most accurate pollster in the UK?<\/a><\/li>\n
      4. Do UK pollsters show forecasting skill?<\/a><\/li>\n
      5. My Welsh Barometer Poll forecast was a success!<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        To see my previous Opinion Poll Trackers, please click the relevant month below.<\/p>\n