{"id":5682,"date":"2024-06-23T19:36:17","date_gmt":"2024-06-23T18:36:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/?p=5682"},"modified":"2024-06-25T12:22:29","modified_gmt":"2024-06-25T11:22:29","slug":"uk-general-election-2024-forecast-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-election-2024-forecast-1\/","title":{"rendered":"UK General Election 2024 #3 &#8211; My Forecast as of 23rd June 2024"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My first forecast of the number of seats to be won by each party in the 2024 UK General Election is &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON 108<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB 442<\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>OTH 100<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>My Articles on the 2024 UK General Election<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-election-2019-2-my-forecast-beats-the-exit-poll\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The most accurate forecaster of the 2019 general election<\/a> &#8211; I was independently assessed as the most accurate forecaster beating even Sir John Curtice&#8217;s exit poll.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-elections-keir-starmers-road-to-downing-street\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Keir Starmer&#8217;s Train to Downing Street<\/a> &#8211; My assessment in 2021 of what Labour needed to do to win the next election.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/my-election-forecasting-track-record\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">My election forecasting Track Record 2010 to 2024<\/a> &#8211; A list of all election forecasts I have made for General, European and Local elections, how I made them, how they turned out and what lessons I learned.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-elections-how-accurate-are-opinion-polls-revised\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">How Accurate are Voting Intention Polls (Revised)<\/a> &#8211; A recent article which explains why I now think the polls are accurate when before they would often underestimate the Conservative lead over Labour.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-election-2024-swing-and-turnout-forecast\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Going Beyond the Swing in 2024<\/a> &#8211; A preliminary look at the 2024 general election at the start of the year.\u00a0 I give probabilities for 10 specific outcomes.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-election-2024-forecasting-model-gb\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">My 2024 UK General Election Forecasting Model<\/a> &#8211; I use a top down forecasting approach based on the sum and difference in Conservative and Labour vote share to predict share of seats won.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Data used in this article<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>All polling data prior to April 2024 comes from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.markpack.org.uk\/opinion-polls\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mark Pack&#8217;s invaluable Pollbase<\/a>.\u00a0 For data since April, I am using <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/uk-politics-68079726\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the BBC poll tracker<\/a>.\u00a0 For a summary of what the polls are saying at the time of this article, see this <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/MarriottNigel\/status\/1804103685070365090\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">X\/Twitter thread<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>All electoral data I display and use in this article comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/commonslibrary.parliament.uk\/data-tools-and-resources\/parliament-elections-data\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">House of Commons Research Library<\/a>.\u00a0 The PDF file I use most of the time is this one <a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/UK-Election-Trends-1918-2019.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">UK Election Trends 1918-2019<\/a>.\u00a0 I&#8217;ve created a spreadsheet <a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GB-General-Election-Data-1918-2019-votes-and-seats.xlsx\">GB General Election Data 1918-2019 &#8211; votes and seats<\/a> which contains all the data used to build my models.\u00a0 For clarity &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Seat Share<\/strong> is the percentage of seats in Great Britain won by each party.<\/li>\n<li><strong>National Vote Share<\/strong> is the percentage of all votes cast in Great Britain for each party.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Average Vote Share<\/strong> (per Seat) is the average of the vote share in each British constituency the party stands in.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I first explained the national and average vote share concepts in my article &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-elections-how-accurate-are-opinion-polls-revised\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>How accurate are voting intention polls? &#8211; Revised<\/em><\/a>&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Reminder of my forecasting model for 2024<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>I am using a top down model to predict total number of seats won by the major parties based on the sum and difference in the Conservative and Labour party average vote share per seat.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-5693\" src=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1578\" height=\"875\" srcset=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623.png 1578w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623-300x166.png 300w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623-1024x568.png 1024w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623-768x426.png 768w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623-1536x852.png 1536w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623-450x250.png 450w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Forecast-GB-20240623-1320x732.png 1320w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1578px) 100vw, 1578px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Once I&#8217;ve estimated sum seat share <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> and seat share difference <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>, I will have two simultaneous equations which can be solved to estimate the percentage of the <strong>632<\/strong> seats in Great Britain that will be won by the Conservative and Labour parties.\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-election-2024-forecasting-model-gb\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">I explain my model in full here<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0For now, my model does not yet split seats won by other parties into the separate parties e.g. Lib Dems, SNP, etc.\u00a0 I am working on this and will include this feature when ready.<\/p>\n<p>One of the questions I have to resolve is which of the fitted lines in the above charts should I use.\u00a0 In fact I will be using simulation where each line has a certain probability of being chosen.<\/p>\n<p>For <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">+<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>, the probabilities I&#8217;ve decided to use are &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Black line<strong> 5%<\/strong> &#8211; it&#8217;s been over <strong>30<\/strong> years since this was the fit hence the low probability<\/li>\n<li>Green line <strong>75%<\/strong> &#8211; the last <strong>7<\/strong> elections have used this fit hence why I say it is the most likely<\/li>\n<li>Brown line <strong>20%<\/strong> &#8211; given the high probability of a new low for <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">+<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> vote share, I am not convinced the green line will hold hence why I&#8217;ve given this a 1 in 5 chance of this occurring.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>, the probabilities I&#8217;ve decided to use are &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Black line <strong>25%<\/strong> &#8211; the last 3 elections have sat on this fit so it can&#8217;t be ruled out.<\/li>\n<li>Green line <strong>75%<\/strong> &#8211; the last 3 times where Labour kicked out a Conservative government with a big swing (<strong>1929, 1945, 1997<\/strong>) all sat on the green line.\u00a0 Polls are pointing to something similar in 2024.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The most likely outcome is that both models use their green fitted lines.\u00a0 This is what I will use to illustrate my forecast.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Reminder of how accurate the polls are<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>I recently realised <a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-elections-how-accurate-are-opinion-polls-revised\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">voting intention polls on average do predict the vote share difference <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> <\/a>provided one compares polls with average vote share per seat rather than national vote share.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-5690\" src=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Diff.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"613\" height=\"301\" srcset=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Diff.png 613w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Diff-300x147.png 300w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Diff-450x221.png 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 613px) 100vw, 613px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>When it comes to the sum vote share <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB,<\/span><\/strong> polls are accurate on average over the whole timescale 1950 to 2019 but that hides notable differences over time.\u00a0 The last four elections, coinciding with a rise in number of pollsters and more web polling, underestimated the total vote share of the two main parties by <strong>3%<\/strong> on average.\u00a0 The step change in 2010 is statistically significant.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-5691\" src=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Sum.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"613\" height=\"307\" srcset=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Sum.png 613w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Sum-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/PollErrors4-GE19-avg-vote-share-Sum-450x225.png 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 613px) 100vw, 613px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>What do the latest polls say?<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>For the week ending 21st June, using published data from <strong>16<\/strong> pollsters, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-5695 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Polls-Summary-20240621.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"290\" height=\"292\" srcset=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Polls-Summary-20240621.png 346w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Polls-Summary-20240621-298x300.png 298w, https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/GE24-Polls-Summary-20240621-150x150.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 290px) 100vw, 290px\" \/>Labour has a <strong>20<\/strong> point lead over the Conservatives.\u00a0 This would be a new record for Labour if this occurs on 4th July.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, the combined <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> vote share of <strong>61%<\/strong> would be the lowest on record since the <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>CON<\/strong><\/span>\/<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>LAB<\/strong><\/span> duopoly began in 1922, beating the <strong>66.6%<\/strong> in 2010.\u00a0 More than that, the current 7 day trend in the <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> vote share is <strong>-1.4%<\/strong> per week.\u00a0 if extrapolated to 4th July, we could be looking at<strong> 59%<\/strong> instead of <strong>61%.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Reform are in 3rd place and are still trending upwards.\u00a0 Some polls already have Reform ahead of the Conservatives.\u00a0 If this were to happen by the eve of the election, I expect to dump the model I am using here in favour of <a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/uk-general-election-forecast-2015\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a variant on the forecasting model I used in 2015<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>How is a forecast made?<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>My official forecast is an average of <strong>1000<\/strong> simulations of possible scenarios.\u00a0 The process works like this.<\/p>\n<p>My first simulation assumes the polls are correct and that both the sum seat share and seat share difference models use the green fit lines.\u00a0 I call this the <strong>Illustrative Example<\/strong> and the calculation works like this.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The estimated sum seat share<strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> is <strong>87.7% <\/strong>using the green fit line\u00a0i.e. Other parties will win <strong>12.3%<\/strong> of the <strong>632<\/strong> seats in Great Britain.<\/li>\n<li>The estimated seat share difference <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> is <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>-55.0%<\/strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\"> using the green fit line<\/span>.<\/span><\/li>\n<li>The estimated <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>CON<\/strong><\/span> seat share is <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>16.3%<\/strong><\/span> = (sum+diff)\/2 = ( <strong>87.7%<\/strong> + <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>-55.0%<\/strong><\/span> )\/2<\/li>\n<li>The estimated <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>LAB<\/strong><\/span> seat share is <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>71.3%<\/strong><\/span> = (sum-diff)\/2 = ( <strong>87.7%<\/strong> &#8211; <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>-55.0%<\/strong><\/span> )\/2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>With<strong> 632<\/strong> seats in all of Great Britain, the illustrative example results in <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>103 CON<\/strong><\/span>, <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>451 LAB<\/strong><\/span> and <strong>78 OTH<\/strong> seats.<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter, the other <strong>999<\/strong> simulations are processed as follows &#8211;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>A random number is added to the <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0vote share indicated by the polls.\u00a0 Given the notable step change in 2010, I am currently drawing a random number from a normal distribution with mean +<strong>2.0%<\/strong> and standard deviation <strong>1.0%<\/strong>.\u00a0 I am keeping this element under review.<\/li>\n<li>A random number between <strong>0<\/strong> and <strong>1<\/strong> is created and this decides whether the fitted model for sum seat share <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong> uses the black (<strong>5%<\/strong>), green (<strong>75%<\/strong>) or brown(<strong>20%<\/strong>) fitted lines.<\/li>\n<li>The chosen fitted line is used to estimate the sum seat share <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>To the estimated sum seat share <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>+<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>, a random number drawn from a normal distribution with mean <strong>0%<\/strong> and standard deviation <strong>0.5%<\/strong> is added to allow for residual error.<\/li>\n<li>A random number is added to the <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0vote share indicated by the polls.\u00a0 This is more straightforward as it is a random draw from a normal distribution with mean <strong>0.0%<\/strong> and standard deviation of <strong>2.5%<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>A random number between <strong>0<\/strong> and <strong>1<\/strong> is created and this decides whether the fitted model for seat share difference <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB <\/span><\/strong>uses the black (<strong>25%)<\/strong> or green (<strong>75%<\/strong>) fitted lines.<\/li>\n<li>The chosen fitted line is used to estimate the seat share difference <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>To the estimated seat share difference <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB<\/span><\/strong>, a random number drawn from a normal distribution with mean <strong>0%<\/strong> and standard deviation <strong>2.5%<\/strong> is added to allow for residual error.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>On completion of all simulations, the average of the estimated sum seat share <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">+<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB <\/span><\/strong>after step 4 and the estimated seat share difference <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">CON<\/span>&#8211;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB <\/span><\/strong>after step 8 are calculated.\u00a0 These are then solved to get the estimated number of seats to be won by the Conservatives, Labour and Others.\u00a0 The <strong>1,000<\/strong> simulations provide data on possible margins of error.<\/p>\n<p>As of <strong>23rd June 2024<\/strong>, my simulations gave me my first official forecast as follows &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>CON 108<\/strong> <\/span>seats (<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">88 to 127<\/span>)<\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">LAB 442<\/span><\/strong> seats (<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">459 to 429<\/span>)<\/li>\n<li><strong>OTH 82<\/strong> seats<\/li>\n<li>Northern Ireland parties <span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>18<\/strong><\/span> seats<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The ranges in brackets represent the interquartile range of my <strong>1000<\/strong> scenarios i.e. from the <strong>25th<\/strong> to the <strong>75th<\/strong> percentile.\u00a0 Note the error in <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>CON<\/strong><\/span> and <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>LAB<\/strong><\/span> are inversely correlated hence why Labour&#8217;s range is from high to low i.e. if the Conservatives do end up with <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>88<\/strong><\/span> seats, Labour are more likely to get around <strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">459<\/span> <\/strong>seats.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">&#8212; Would you like to comment on this article? &#8212;-<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Please do leave your comments on this <strong>X\/Twitter<\/strong> thread.<\/p>\n<h5><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">&#8212; Subscribe to my newsletter to receive more articles like this one! &#8212;-<\/span><\/strong><\/h5>\n<p>If you would like to receive notifications from me of news, articles and offers relating to Elections &amp; Polling, please <span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong><a style=\"color: #008000;\" href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/subscribe-to-our-newsletter\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">click here to go to my Newsletter Subscription page<\/a><\/strong><\/span> and tick the Elections and\/or Surveys category and other categories that may be of interest to you.\u00a0 You will be able to unsubscribe at anytime.<\/p>\n<p>More articles on elections can be found by clicking on the <a href=\"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/category\/elections\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Elections<\/a> tab at the top of your screen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My first forecast of the number of seats to be won by each party in the 2024 UK General Election is &#8211; CON 108 LAB 442 OTH 100<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":5693,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,6],"tags":[21,19,25,215,45,333],"class_list":{"0":"post-5682","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-elections","8":"category-forecasting","9":"tag-election-forecasting","10":"tag-elections","11":"tag-forecasting-model","12":"tag-general-election-2024","13":"tag-seat-forecast","14":"tag-seats","15":"entry","16":"override"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5682"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5707,"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5682\/revisions\/5707"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5693"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marriott-stats.com\/nigels-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}